Sunday, November 29, 2015

Electric Car’s impact on a global and local scale through Carbon emissions and cost reduction, parking benefits on campus and issues with charging

       Electric Cars have been around for over 100 years. In fact, Ferdinand Porsche, founder of the Porsche car company, developed the all-electric P1 in 1898. He planned to mass produce and potentially dominate the car industry with an easy-charging, fast automobile.
       
       However, Henry Ford, founder of Ford motors, developed the Model T in 1908. The Model T was an all gasoline powered automobile and it swept consumers off their feet. With a price of $638, everyone bought Ford’s affordable product over Porsche’s $1,750 all-electric car.

        It is said that Ford’s Model T is what started the gasoline-powered vehicle production and development. However, gasoline powered cars are becoming a controversial issue. With the rising carbon emissions, rapid depletion of natural resources and destruction of environment, Gasoline cars “cheapness” may not be paying off long-term.

     Recently, electric cars have been developed and are becoming widely sold everywhere with recent research depicting its benefits for society. Electric cars have been known for reducing carbon emissions and receiving economic benefits. However, as electric cars have started to become popular, issues such as slow charging have slowed the electric car movement.


Carbon Emissions and Cost are greatly reduced when switching from conventional to electric cars
   



   
          Professor Mathias Frisch perspective provides a good background to a modern view on electric cars. Since the commercialization of cars and public transportation in the 1950’s, more people have been using them for transportation. As a result, there has been a sharp increase in carbon emissions into the atmosphere. Carbon emissions have been examined in a study done by the University of Berkeley.

    The university compared carbon emissions from cars between the years 1960 and 2008. The study found that 1.4 billion carbon metric tonnes were released in 1960 and 4.2 million metric tonnes were released in 2008. Carbon emissions essentially tripled in a matter of half of a decade.
     
         Additionally, high carbon emissions are found to inhibit plants and trees ability to perform evapotranspiration. Evapotranspiration is the process in which plants give off water through their pores which cool the plants and acts as a natural air conditioner for their surroundings.

       Carnegie Mellon conducted a study with doubling the world’s carbon emissions and found that inhibition of evapotranspiration lead to a 16% warming of the lands surface by around four degrees.  
   
      To combat this issue, car developers made electric cars such as the Nissan Leaf, Smart Car, and Tesla.  Electric cars have surfaced in the market in the past decade and already have started to solve several problems related to cost. Compared to Plug in hybrid electric cars (PHEV) users who pay $16,000 premium for their vehicle, all electric cars users pay only $10,000 dollars premium.
    
      On average each month, a gas-powered vehicle costs the owner around $147 for gasoline and this number could increase. On the other hand, electric powered cars cost the owner a simple $17 dollar increase in their utility bill. 
     The public opinion on electric cars and their efforts to reduce carbon emissions is relative positive. In 2012, A survey conducted by J.D. Power and Associates 2012 Electric Vehicle Ownership Experience found that around 44% of electric vehicle owners believed they benefited the most from their vehicles low carbon emissions. The surge in research on electric cars impacts on carbon emissions has allowed for statistics to be collected in almost any zip code in North America.
 
        A study, which has the capability to track carbon emissions by area, examined fuel cost and greenhouse gas emissions compared to the vehicle mode. The research conveys that conventional, gas cars emit around two times the amount of emissions compared to an all-electric car. Additionally, the fuel cost was more than three times in conventional cars when compared to all electric. Also, demand for electric cars has changed vastly in the past 5 years.
     
     The market for electric cars has sharply expanded globally. The Centre for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research did an analysis of electric cars which shows 320,000 new owner registrations in the past year bringing the current global electric car ownership to a quarter million cars. The analysis also saw a growth rate of 76% worldwide with overall electric vehicle registrations doubling each year between 2012 and 2014.
    
      With the increasing ownership and market expansion of electric cars, the world could possible see a dynamic change from a petroleum dominant society to the increased prevalence of electric cars. In turn, carbon emissions could be greatly reduced with this shift.

University of Maryland provides free charging station and green benefits for electric cars

     Currently, the University of Maryland offers students 15 lots to park in throughout the academic year. To be able to park in these lots, students have to first determine availability by lot and then pay for a permit which ranges from $249 to $581 annually. If one were to quadruple this price range for four academic years, the permit range would be from $996 to $2324. However, if you are driving electric car, the rules are quite different.
   
Academic term Resident Students Commuter Students Satellite Resident Expiration date
Annual $481 $249 $581 8/26/2016
Fall Only $289 $149 $349 12/11/2015
Spring Only $241 $125 $281 8/26/2016
Summer Only $241 $125 $241 8/26/2016

     UMD has implemented 16 charging stations across 7 main locations throughout campus. Charging is free at these locations and the charging stations can fully charge your car in a matter of 4 to 8 hours. Essentially, an individual will not have to pay for charging their vehicle during the week as they can simply park their cars at these locations during the day.

     Also, UMD researchers are finding new ways to invent more reasonable electric charging stations to allow quicker and easier charging for students and faculty. In fact, the university is teaming with electric car companies to make their vision a potential reality.
     
      However, parking at these stations still requires registering with UMD Department of Transportation (DOTS). Nevertheless, parking permits for electric and low-emission vehicles are qualified for the Green Permit program. The program offers individuals with a 20% discount on their parking permits for each semester.

    The UMD web page states the, “program encourages the use of green vehicles and recognizes the role that they play in helping the university become more sustainable”. In addition, to know if an individual’s vehicle qualifies, they can check using the EPA website. In spite of these benefits, the university previously had policy which advocated and promoted electric cars significantly.

    Before September 2014, electric car users received a 50% discount for parking permits on a semester basis. After September 2014, electric cars lost this perk and placed in The
Green Permit program putting them on the same level as hybrids and low carbon emission vehicles. Sadly, the university appears to have possibly disincentivize the use of electric cars on campus.

       Lanny, an electric car activist, had a meeting with David Allen; director of DOTS. Allen explained that “EV owners are part of the upper income bracket” and that the policy motivation was to provide a “financial break to these individuals”.

       The meeting conveyed an interesting thought that socio-economic issues have a substantial impact on policies for a local scale. The introduction of electric cars has provided fruitful benefits but has put forth conflicting issues. These issues could potentially hinder electric cars sustainability on a local scale.

Electric Cars face charging issues but may have a potential solution 

   Currently, pumping gas takes 5 minutes when an individual's gas tank is low on fuel. In addition, gas stations are widely available with there being multiple locations in any city. On the other hand, charging electric cars take up to 8 hours for a full charge. Additionally, there are currently only 11,324 charging stations in the United States. With sparsely located charging stations, long trips seem to be planned with charging station locations in mind.
      
    Professor Frisch accounted that he personally would plan trips to Rehoboth beach; relying on the location of a charging station. On one occasion, the charging station was “not even there” as the location posted online was not accurate. In turn, the issue with accessibility creates a bigger rift with using electric cars as a primary mode of transportation. However, a potential solution may be surfacing in the near future.
    
        Recently, Tesla has been testing a new charging station prototype known as the “Supercharger”. Superchargers make 120kW of power versus current charging stations producing 10-12kW. Essentially, this means that a charge which would take around 8 hours now takes a little more than 30 minutes for a full charge. As a result, electric car owners can now grab food or go shopping and have a full charge when they return. On top of that, individuals can check the status of their car’s battery via the use of an app.

     However, Superchargers only work with the Tesla’s Model S and there are only 557 supercharging stations nationwide. Hopefully, the compatibility of Superchargers can expand to allow and benefit a greater user base. Speaking of this, Tesla future plans include the addition of superchargers near major highways, congested cities, ski resorts, restaurants and hotels. Tesla plans to open over 30 new supercharging stations in the next couple of months. In the future, Supercharger’s may be the next Exxon or Shell for the electric car industry.

   

  Professor Frisch brought up an interesting point. Since the surfacing of electric cars in 2010, a wide spectrum of changes occurred ranging from localities such as universities to the global platform in regards to the economy, carbon emissions and even infrastructure. Electric cars are becoming a widely growing product that is being accepted across various different countries and societies.
      
     At this point, electric cars are slowly becoming a part of a progressive, modern era which craves for the next, new, innovative product. Moreover, carbon emissions are currently accounting for 83% of all greenhouses gases that are in our atmosphere. With human activities such as deforestation and burning of fossil fuels, it is getting harder for ecosystems to remove carbon emissions on their own. . As a result, it is important for the current generation to advocate what is best for the future of society.
     
     From cutting down carbon emissions which cause global warming to providing economic benefits, electric cars could be a catalyst to end the petroleum dominant society. It is imperative that lawmakers, citizens and corporations continue to consider electric cars as it could potentially be a savior to the preservation and progression of our world for the next generation.





Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Perceptions and its effects on online dating: A growing movement influencing society

        
        Have you heard of eHarmony, match.com or probably the better known app, Tinder? You probably know these as places where individuals try to match for a short-term hookup or a date. However, in 2014, 11% of American adults used dating sites and 4 out of 10 of these individuals are looking for a partner online. So, it seems that the average American is pretty serious on finding the perfect "one". The question now is, what qualities are people looking for when looking for their soul mate? A pretty interesting study done by Seunga Venus goes into this general topic with a deeper focus. The study looks into the qualities of trustworthiness, interpersonal attraction and the Big Five personality traits(agreeableness, conscientiousness, neurotics, openness, and attraction). The interesting addition to this is the experimenters decided to test the effects of the dater's profile of being conservative/open-minded on people's perceptions of these qualities.

           The study incorporated 65 undergraduate students from a major U.S. university who were randomly selected and assigned to the two groups. The individuals made profiles using manipulation stimuli, i.e. making their profile and pictures match an "open minded"/ "close minded" look. For example, the traditional/uptight pictures featured , "loose clothing" covering the maximum amount skin. The open/free-spirited pictures featured  flashy daters in tight, revealing clothing. Afterwards, the participants were matched with individuals from the opposite sex. The Source Credibility Scale, Interpersonal Attraction Scales, and NEO Big Five inventories were all used to measure the desired qualities reported from the participants. To make sure each person was perceiving the profiles as traditional/open minded, a questionnaire was used answering various questions. The study was performed using these parameters and determined that in the open condition scenario, participants perceived each other to be more open than in the traditional scenario. Interesting enough, this matches the confirmation bias which is a tendency to search or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions. The participants in the traditional conditions are perceived to be more trustworthy, interpersonally attractive, agreeable conscientious and neurotic than open minded individuals. The study demonstrated the impact user-generated profiles had on the user's perception for the major qualities that are sought for. Interesting enough, online dating seems to have also caused certain perceptions to arise in women.

       Molly Shapiro, journalist for the Huffington Post, brings a different view on online dating . She wrote an article describing how online dating is something that women just will not do but is something they should do. She plunges into several, interesting topics on the subject matter. She dives in with the idea that women will not go into dating because people will perceive them as loser who seeks desperation. However, she goes into the scenario that when women go out to places such as bars, men will tend to objectify them, taking looks mostly into account. However, she talks about how when using online dating sites, you can efficiently and sensibly find hundreds of potential individuals who have lengthy profiles with "background, intersects, personality". Shapiro's attitude surprisingly connects to the previously mentioned study that people tend to look at someone's internal qualities (traditional) then their external qualities(open-minded). She also brings forth a counter-example to bolster her argument. She explains how women have that common perception that men lie online. The author brings forth a short anecdote on how she even matched and fell in love with a man whose whole persona was a lie. Finally, the author brings up the notion that women want that good "how we met story". She discusses how her current, 4-year old relationship was with someone she matched online who she was initially unsure about. Now, she got to know his qualities and does not feel shame and is proud to be with him which also connects with conclusion from the study where people's user generated profiles affect their perception. The article provides an fascinating example of how previous notions are slowly becoming criticized.

          From reading the study and article, you are probably asking, "so what? what was the point of this?". Well the article and study provided points which reveal how our current society is shifting. With the modernization of technology, individuals are shaping their ideas and perceptions on dating around it. Personally, Tinder is something that I see used by almost all of my friends. Additionally, the pictures and methods discussed in the study are things that my peers surprisingly use to make themselves more attractive to women on Tinder. Also, the article shows how a woman's perception represent how this new method of dating is slowly becoming  acceptable and viable. Her perception may be an attitude that many others share and could possibly be a norm sometime in the future, Something to consider next time you are looking for that "one".
        
          




          




Monday, September 7, 2015

Rich Gulf countries around Syria are providing little to no asylum for the hundreds of thousands of displaced Syrians

I am sharing this on my social media because this is an important humanitarian issue which concerns the whole world including the United States. It is important that I share this with my friends and people in my social network to raise awareness on this ongoing issue.